one of the con arguments states that the economy won't suffer if copyright law is eliminated. The argument is that when someone is given a shared file rather than spending money to buy it, the money isn't lost to the economy; it’s simply redirected to buy something else, such as the pizza. Is this a fair argument? Why or why not?

an unexpected salary cut

ththis should be under spanish

can someone me with this question:  

1) the end of the conflict between the north and the south didn’t just mark the end of a war; it marked the end of an entire way of life.” which statement best describes what this statement means?  

a) the southerners were no longer free and were controlled by the northern states.

b) the industrial economy in the north was not sustainable.

c) slavery became illegal, which changed completely the south’s labor force and the agricultural economy was destroyed.

d) the states decided to relinquish their independence and return to britain’s rule.