What were some economic similarities between 18th century English North American colonies and England/Britain?

Most major differences:

Role of Government

The role that government played in the American colonies was much smaller than in Britain itself. A rallying cry for American independence was “no taxation without representation!” Well, guess what? The people back home in Britain had representation, all right, so they were taxed on a wide variety of things, although income tax wouldn’t arise until after 1800. On the other hand, taxes in the American colonies were virtually nonexistent. However, levels of government services were not correspondingly better in Britain, as most tax money went into subsidizing businesses such as the East India Company and into fighting Britain’s wars.

Economy

The American colonies were much better off economically in 1770 than Great Britain was. Without taxation and with the benefit of free trade within the vast British Empire, the North American colonies had the highest per capita standard of living in the world. However, the drawback to free trade was that they were kept in a largely agrarian economy, as their function in the Empire was to provide raw materials to Britain’s newly-formed industry. As a result, by 1800, Britain was far ahead of the new US in industry, and that industry lead was what made independence so daunting for the colonists.

Major similarities:

Social structure

The social structure in the colonies varied widely by region, but situations in each colony were analogous to the social structure in parts of England. The South resembled the English countryside, in which landed gentry were at the top, while propertyless whites and slaves were at the bottom. In urban centers like Boston and New York, the new middle class of merchants, doctors, bankers, and lawyers dominated the social scene. Rural New England was similar to some areas in Scotland and England in which yeoman farmers owned land independently of aristocracy.

Culture

The culture and education of the American colonies was essentially British culture. Colonists and British spoke the same languages, read the same books, danced the same dances, ate similar food, and had virtually identical worldviews. Religious denominations were more diverse in America, but social and cultural priorities were largely consistent between the two.

There are other similarities and differences, but these are the biggest ones I can think of at the moment. Essentially, the colonists and the British were the same people, but with different economic situations and political expectations.

Sorry Dont know this question

you can ask me business related question

especially research the treaty of greenville and the treaty of colerain in washington's administration.   also research at least one significant treaty from the administrations of adams, jefferson, and madison. tell the outcome of each treaty and how it did or did not in the further development of the west.

treaty of greenville (1814) the treaty of greenville (1814) was called a treaty of peace and friendship between the united states of america and the tribes of native americans called the wyandots, delawares, shawanoese, senacas and miamies.

the treaty of colerain was signed at st. marys, georgia in camden county, georgia, by benjamin hawkins, george clymer, and andrew pickens for the united states and representatives of the creek nation, for whom indian trader langley bryant served as an interpreter, on june 29, 1796, proclaimed on march 18, 1797, and codified as 7 stat. 56. colerain was a small community and the site of a u.s. indian factory founded by james seagrove.  

this treaty affirmed the binding of the treaty of new york (1790). the treaties of hopewell and the treaty of holston (1791) established boundary lines between the choctaws, chickasaws, cherokee, and the u.s. the treaty of colerain bound the creek nation to acknowledge the boundaries established in those treaties.  

it also established the boundary line between the creek nation and the united states. at the time of this treaty, the boundaries between spanish florida and the u.s. had not yet been established. this treaty formally allowed the creek chiefs to acknowledge the negotiation for delineating the georgia-florida boundary with spain.  

the treaty contained a provision that the president of the u.s. may establish a trading or military outpost.  

the united states demanded that the creeks give up their american prisoners and also return all "citizens, white inhabitants, negroes and property" taken by the creeks.  

the treaty describes when it would take effect. after the treaty had been signed but not yet promulgated, the u.s. senate requested modification of two articles of the treaty. the first modification stipulated that the military or trading posts would be under the control of the united states. the second modification stipulated that if the u.s. no longer required the use of those posts, the locations would revert to the creek people.  

gays

explanation: