How important was slavery to the economics of the southern and northern English colonies, and to England, and how did slaves form their own culture in the English colonies?

Slavery was very important to the economics of the Southern colonies. The South was focused on agriculture and had the perfect climate to do so, which was warm with fertile soil. The South took advantage of this and ended up creating huge farms, which were called plantations, and ended up growing cash crops, which were crops that sold for a lot of money overseas. Some of the cash crops that were grown were rice, tobacco, indigo, and later on, cotton. In order to keep these farms up and going, many Southern plantation owners turned to labor work for help. Indentured servants were people who needed to pay their debt for a number of years, as many Southern people bought their passage to America. They first started off helping on plantations, but Southern plantation owners wanted a cheaper and more permanent approach. This was when they started to use slavery.

To the Northern colonies, slavery was not as important, as they weren't as focused on agriculture. The climate in the North was often cold and rainy, with no fertile soil to grow crops. This caused the North to focus on more industrialized businesses, like shipbuilding and woodcutting. The North did not need as much labor to make money, so they were not as impacted by slavery like they were in the South.

England was not fond of slavery and had already abolished slavery way before the Civil War started. One of the tactics Abraham Lincoln used during the Civil War was issuing the Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves in the rebel states. He properly made the war "all about slavery" and wanted to make Great Britain not send goods to the South anymore by showing England that the South was continuing to support slavery. This shows how England was not a huge fan of slavery and outlawed slavery much earlier than the United States did.

As more generations and generations of slaves continued in America, they started to form their own culture. While most of the time slave owners would try to strip slaves of their culture and even punish them if they saw any ounce of it, it did not stop most slaves from continuing. Many slaves would create songs, tunes, and even poems, some originating back to where they came from. A lot of these songs are associated with the Underground Railroad, as slaves wanted to spread the message and hope that a way to freedom existed. Many of these songs are still popular today.

the answer is hope this you.

in 'popular history' of europe in america it's common to blame the rise of the nazis (and of coursewwii, too) mainly on the treaty of versailles. despite the harshness of the treaty and despite the inflation of 1919-23 germany did benefit from the economic buoyancy of the roaring twenties. in the general election in 1928, the nazis only managed to get 12 (out of about 584) seats in the reichstag. the nazis were widely seen as a laughing-stock led by a funny little man given to yelling and wild gesticulation. of all european countries, none was hit harder than germany by the stockmarket crash of october 1929. germany had borrowed very large sums from american banks, with much of the money repayable either on demand or at short notice. these loans were of course recalled, and bankruptcies in germany rose sharply from the start of 1930 (or earlier). unemployment rose sharply, too. the german constitution of 1919 contained much that was utopian, including the right to paid employment. the realities of the situation made a mockery of the weimar constitution. one of german's great weaknesses at the time was the lack of a broadly based, popular right-wing party comparable to, say, the republicans in the us or the conservatives in britain. the obvious candidate, the german nationalists (the dnvp), had lost its grip and was hopelessly out oftouch with many of its supporters especially in rural areas. germany became increasingly hard to govern.

from about the middle of 1930 onwards the new chancellor, br�ning, had to govern by decree. in the absence of mainstream right-wing party, the nazis - who ruthlessly exploited genuine grievances - suddenly became the largest single party in the reichstag. with the growing effects of the great depression, unemployment reached about 27% (or more) in 1932. acting on bad advice (from the dnvp) hindenburg dismissed brüning in july 1932. in the general election that followed, the nazis won 37% of the seats. the other party that did well was the communist party (kpd) with 14%. fresh elections were held in november 1932: the nazi vote fell slightly, but the communist vote rose to 17%. in the streets of berlin and other major cities violence between left and right and their paramilitary wings grew. by late 1932, the effects of the great depression in germany had passed their peak, but this wasn't obvious at the time. the steady rise in communist vote triggered panic among most of the mainstream parties. after trying various solutions to the political crisis, hindenburg again took very bad advice - again from the dnvp. on the basis of this advice, he appointed hitler reichs chancellor on 30 january 1933 who promised to form a coalition with the german nationalists (dnvp). he did so, but at the same time almost immediately unleashed the sa (stormtroopers) who started a reign of terror within two months germany became a dictatorship, complete with concentration camps. joncey

explanation: