During times of war or national crisis, Congress has passed laws that place limits on our First Amendment freedom of speech. In the landmark decision of Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court held that — A. laws, such as the Smith Act, that limit free speech protect the country from the spread of Nazism and Communism

B. “symbolic speech” such as flag burning, meant to convey a political message, is illegal under the First Amendment

C. the publishing of critical anti-government statements with the “intent to defame” is
considered treason

D. language that presents a clear and present danger to national security is not protected by the First Amendment

what are local authorities doing to fix the problem

explanation:

letter a is the answer

the safahids used force when persuasion to convert from being a sunni muslim to embrace shi'ism was not effective. they also persecute shi'ites who have different views from their imposed teachings.

so, based on the research i've done. the u.s. government were always on a wild goose chase just to take down castro. he then retired his trone to his brother raul in 2008 due to some health issues. so it's obvious your answer would be:

castro had no allies from which he could receive aid.

hope this and have a fantastic day!

                                                    -wolfiewolffromsketch