Courts that use a landmark case as precedent for a decision are (1) using an earlier case as a guide.(2) changing the previous case’s decision.(3) using a third party to review the case.(4) sending the case to a higher court for review.

(1) using an earlier case as a guide.

Explanation:

A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.

There are different types of courts and these includes;

I. Trial court.

II. Circuit court.

III. Appeal court.

IV. Supreme court.

Legal practitioners such as judges are saddled with the legal responsibility of listening to evidences, facts and thereafter, give a verdict about legal cases based on laws and landmark case.

A landmark case can be defined as an earlier court case that establishes a new law and sets new precedents because of its historical and legal significance. Thus, a landmark case substantially affects how an existing law is interpreted and applied to new court cases.

Some examples of landmark cases around the world are;

I. Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr.

II. Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co. Ltd.

III. Mahe v Alberta.

IV. McCulloch v. Maryland

V. Law v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration).

VI. Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia.

VII. Worcester v. Georgia (1832).

VIII. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824).

This ultimately implies that, courts that use a landmark case as precedent for a decision are using an earlier case as a guide.

id say bottom left to top top left to bottom right and middle to middle

explanation:

in which two ways were the northeast woodland indians and the southeast indians similar? both collaborated to form the iroquois confederacy. both cultivated the crops of corn, beans, and squash. both lived in rich environments of swamps and rivers. both lived in tree-bark dwellings called wigwams. both expected men to hunt, while women farmed.