How did the lack of executive and judicial branches weaken the national government under the articles of confederation?

The lack of an executive branch meant the national government wasn´t able to implement or enforce legislative decisions. The lack of a judicial branch meant there wasn´t a process placed to resolve disputes between states.

Explanation:

Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had substantial power, while the central government was kept weak by only allowing its authority over specific issues. The national government relied on the states to enforce national laws, as well as to regulate trade resolve disputes, and printing money.

just need the points

explanation:

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.