Then, use the information you have learned from the article and throughout the lesson to complete this charting activity. Three topics are provided; you can include up to two more of interest. Include informed opinion about how and whether the changes occurring in the South represented successes or failures in Reconstruction. Then, write an editorial evaluating progress (or lack thereof). Be sure your editorial is clear in its stance, and cite specific examples to support your opinion.

Following are the response to the given question:

Explanation:

Economy:

However, as the economics of northeastern states, reconstruction intended to leave the economy of the heat Sources without the use of slaves. The concept was certainly very lovely, but the way this was developed did not happen. In the first years of rebuilding, the states in the south endured heavy economic repression and although they were able to recover the economy with time, they rarely achieved whatever the northern countries present.

Politics:

This rebuilding tried to limit Southern's democratic engagement, had no beneficial outcomes as there was a southern American regime with times of abuse of power and indifference of North leaders who thought it essential to punish Southern. Furthermore, the standards and regs in the area stimulated racism and systemic racism, which show that the reconstruction program could not accomplish its objectives.

Education:

The goal was that classrooms would be built in the south such that people would have complete access to education. Nevertheless, there are still no projects showing the necessity of building schools, although the structures were being built by the people in the north. Such schools were spurned by Southerners and demolished by their youngsters for concern that the northern ideals were contaminated, and so this tactic for the restoration of a South failed once again.

Editorial:

While the rebuilding purpose was positive, it can be said that it was not performed efficiently. This because rehabilitation did not diminish the rejection and disdain of northern people. This issue should be debated during the reconstruction. The absence of dialogue about this subject means the public reject the rebuilding techniques proposed by the government and all the plans failed.

explanation:

there are two statements that are incorrect.

1. the marshall plan was a lend lease program. it was an economic plan that europe redevelop itself after wwii.

2. einstein didn't really do anything to further the allied cause in building the bomb. he merely sent a letter to fdr telling him (in 1939) that if the united states entered the war, perhaps it would be wise to build the bomb before germany did. i would say this answer is incorrect, but when america entered the war 2 years later, fdr thought it might be a good idea to take einstein's advice.

the 4th choice is definitely so wrong that is likely the single answer of this question

the correct answer option is: weapons.

explanation:

tensions rose as the two opposing superpowers competed for 'weapons'.

referring to the cold war (1945-1991), the two superpowers, usa and ussr, experienced a phase of struggle and conflict with each other. these two superpowers considered each other as a threat to their survival and thus opted for policies to strengthen their positions.

the two superpowers never went to war with each other directly but competed for weapons to preserve their positions.