subject
History, 02.06.2021 16:40 meiyrarodriguez

Please answer all questions in PROPER sentences. Try to answer all questions.

Source 1: written by Millicent Fawcett to a friend in 1910.
I have tried to persuade the Pankhursts (leaders of the Suffragettes) of the damage their actions are causing the whole of the women’s movement. The breaking of windows, chaining themselves to railings, fighting in the street with police. The good men and women of this country cannot support this action. Those who agreed with women gaining the vote only a few years ago, would not admit it today. Politicians who were in talks with us now close their doors.

Source 2: open letter to the News of the World written by Emmeline Pankhurst in 1911.
There are many who will say we are wrong for taking militant action and we do more harm than good to the women’s cause. But I say to them, look at what peaceful methods and polite talk have done for the cause, nothing, we are no better today than we were in 1897 when the NUWSS started. We waited and tried the legal and proper ways, but we have been given no choice but to fight men in the language they know, violence. It is the politicians and press that have forced us to take these drastic measure, if they had listened then we would not be in this situation. We will no longer be ignored and look we are being talked about, this is why we have used direct action.

1. “Militant action was necessary in order to bring about change.” Which of the two sources can be used to support this view. Use evidence from the extract you choose to support your answer.

2. Why do sources 1 and 2 disagree about the effect and success of militant action? Who? When?

Read source 3 and answer question 3:

Extract 3: taken from a history textbook.
Prime Minister Asquith can be held accountable for the failure of the government to deal with the issue of the women’s movement. There is a direct correlation (link) between his actions over the Conciliation Bill in 1911 and the intensity of the Suffragette campaign. When Asquith changed the bill to include all men getting the vote it secured the bill’s failure. There was no chance parliament were going to give the vote to all men which meant the women lost out. Who can blame women for losing patience with the Prime Minister, he had given them hope only to snatch it away again. The biggest impact his actions had was on the suffragettes, they escalated their campaign of violence leading to many women being sent to prison. This in turn led to hunger strikes and Asquith ordering the force feeding of women (a tube forced down their noses into their stomachs and liquid food poured down). The dreadful treatment of women by the hands of the government led to great sympathy among the British public. Therefore, Asquith is key to understanding the growing support of the women’s movement before World War One.

3. Use source 3 and your own knowledge to explain how Prime Minister Asquith (1908-1916) led to growing support for the women’s movement after 1911.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
The occupies the territory between the coastal plain in the appalachian mountains. a. piedmont. b. tidewater. c. delaware valley. d. outer banks.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:50
Egypt is home to one of the oldest human civilizations. theearliest egyptian dynasty was established around 3100bce. egypt was ruled by powerful leaders known as pharaohs until the 500s bce, when it was conquered by a series of invaders, including the persian empire and the roman empire. after the fall of the roman empire, egypt became part of aseries of muslim empires, including the ottoman empire.european powers then occupied egypt beginning in the late 18th century. today, egypt is an independent republic with its own constitution and elected leaders. however, some modern observers worry that powerful military leaders have seized too much power in the country. it is possible that egypt will become an autocratic state if these leaders continue to grow more powerful.which statement from the passage addresses an event from the present? a. after the fall of the roman empire, egypt became part of a seriesof muslim empires, including the ottoman empire.b. egypt was ruled by powerful leaders known as pharaohs until the 500s bce, when egypt was conquered by a series of invaders, including the persian empire and the roman empire.c. it is possible that egypt will become an autocratic state if the leaders continue to grow more powerful.d. however some modern observers worry that powerful military leaders have seized too much power in the country.edit: the correct answer is d
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
What were the immediate effects of prohibition? check all that apply. bootleggers illegally made and sold alcohol. corruption and crime increased. speakeasies were the only legal places to buy alcohol. crime and corruption decreased. alcohol sales were banned in the united states.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
Describe the difference between absolute and relative chronologies. if you were describing a series of events in your life, how could you describe them in two ways?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Please answer all questions in PROPER sentences. Try to answer all questions.

Source 1...
Questions
question
Geography, 26.02.2021 18:50
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 18:50
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 18:50