As seen in the Scott case, the laws and amendments of the constitution are subject to an ever changing interpretation. Do you think this fact makes the constitution a stronger or weaker document? Why? HELP ME GUYS!

evelyn "champagne" king

love come down

explanation:

the correct answer is “opportunity cost”. opportunity cost is what a company misses out because it decided in one option over another one. in this case, the company decided to invest in building a factory so it gave up another possible benefit or profit in order to achieve success with the factory.  

trade-off is not the correct answer since it is a situation in which you accept losing something in return for benefits in other areas.

and finally, consequence is a general term used to accept what it comes when you make a decision. it can be a positive or negative consequence depending if the decision you took was the correct one.  

darwinism is survival of the fittest there for social darwinism is the survival of the wealthiest

your answer to this question is true hope this