[President Johnson] said [in 1964], ‘...We have talked long enough in this country about equal rights. We have talked for one hundred years or more. It is time now to write the next chapter, and to write it in the books of law’...a law that would ‘eliminate from this nation every trace of discrimination and oppression that is based upon race and color.’ a). Briefly explain one specific example of American citizens taking action to bring attention to the overall issue described in the passage above between the years 1954-1965.

b). Briefly explain a specific example of a new federal law from the 1960s that addressed the overall issue described in the passage above.

c). Briefly explain one specific example of either a CHANGE or a CONTINUITY about the overall issue described above between the years of 1965 and current times.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

answer is 1935

because gandhi led a march the sea in 1930 and 5 years later he did it again

bye cutting off more workers so the graph can go back up