Describe the Korematsu case and how each side used the US constitution to justify their arguments. What amendments or clauses in the constitution did they refer to as evidence of their argument? How did the court rule on this case? Would the government of the United States today be allowed to place citizens in concentration camps again during a time of war?

What are some alternative decisions the U. S. government might have taken in 1941?

PLEASE HELP

utilized the penal colony

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this

answer: a tolerated diverse population

explanation: the city of baghdad formed to vast semi- circles on the right and left banks of the tigris twelve miles in a diameter.