Which of the following arguments is an argument of value? a. if mansa musa had never converted to islam, mali would have never become wealthy. b. because mansa musa made a pilgrimage to mecca, we can assume he was a muslim. c. mansa musa was an excellent leader and one of africa's greatest muslim kings. d. mansa musa's conversion to islam brought the kingdom of mali into the islamic world.

If there is just on correct argument in here, we can say it is option:

B. Because Mansa Musa made a pilgrimage to Mecca, we can assume he was a Muslim. Option C could be, too, He was very known as one of the greatest's muslim kings.

- The kingdom of Mali was already in the slamic world, what refutes option D, to confirm it is not correct

- As far as what we can learn about Mansa Musa reign, there is no such thing as "his conversion" to islam, he was muslim before his reign, and he was wealthy, just like his Kingdom. The fact he was muslim had nothing to do with Mali's weath. That confirms option A is not correct.  

the answer to number 5 is fort sumter

when world war i broke out across europe in 1914, president woodrow wilson proclaimed the united states would remain neutral, and many americans supported this policy of nonintervention. however, public opinion about neutrality started to change after the sinking of the british ocean liner lusitania by a german u-boat in 1915; almost 2,000 people perished, including 128 americans. along with news of the zimmerman telegram threatening an alliance between germany and mexico, wilson asked congress for a declaration of war against germany. the u.s. officially entered the conflict on april 6, 1917.