History, 08.10.2019 13:30 lilswetheart2007
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
a. to hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
b. to learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
c. to see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
d. to understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
Answers: 3
Another question on History
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Some historians argue that the changes brought by industrialization caused americans to beomce a more secular people. to what extent do you agree or disagree, and why? use evidence from chapter 18 to make your case.
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What’s the term used for a lawyer who argues for the convection for a defendant in a criminal case?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Which statement best explains how maynard jackson's 1968 decision foretold his future? he was elected mayor of atlanta in 1973 he was elected governor of georgia in 1990. he started his own bond and security business he removed segregation signs form water fountains at city hall
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 09:20
1. what was william harvey's discovery about the human body? @ two types of blood flowed through the veins and arteries. b four fluids existed in the body: blood, yellow bile, black bile, and phlegm. © the same blood flowed through the veins and arteries. d ancient ideas of human anatomy and bodily functions were wrong. done
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historica...
Questions
History, 13.12.2019 22:31
Social Studies, 13.12.2019 22:31
Social Studies, 13.12.2019 22:31
Mathematics, 13.12.2019 22:31
Mathematics, 13.12.2019 22:31
History, 13.12.2019 22:31
Mathematics, 13.12.2019 22:31
Biology, 13.12.2019 22:31
Mathematics, 13.12.2019 22:31
Mathematics, 13.12.2019 22:31
Social Studies, 13.12.2019 22:31
