What is joseph chamberlain's justification for the british occupation of egypt?

The correct answer is B) it creates new markets for the British economy.

The other options of the question were A) Egypt is the greatest and most valuable of all the customers Britain has. C) it is the only way Egypt can become self-sufficient. D) Britain has no choice but to bring civilization to Egypt.

Joseph Chamberlain's justification for the British occupation of Egypt is "it creates new markets for the British economy."

Chamberlain said during foreign policy speeches: "I am convinced that it is a necessity as well as a duty for us to uphold the dominion [power] an empire which we now possess. For these reasons, among others, I would never lose the hold which we now have over our great Indian dependency - by far the greatest and most valuable of all the customers we have or ever shall have in this country. For the same reasons I approve of the continued occupation of Egypt; and for the same reasons I have urged upon this Government . . . to extend our influence and control in that great African continent which is now being opened to civilization and to commerce."

Britain knew that their colonies in Africa provided it with so many raw materials and natural resources, Britain exploited these resources, sent them to England to be manufactured and produced many goods that they later exported. This represented big business and a lot of money for the British crown.

the only true answer is that it expanded after 325 ad.

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)