What decisions did nazi leaders make at the wannsee conference in 1942? check all that apply.
1) the genocide of europe’s jews would be carried out.
2) goebbels was put in charge of carrying out the genocide.
3)the term “final solution” was used to refer to the genocide.
4) other groups considered racially or ethnically inferior were targets.
5)wealthy jews could leave europe after paying a large amount of money.

The correct answers are number 1.- The genocide of Europe’s Jews would be carried out, number 3.- the term “Final Solution” was used to refer to the genocide, and number 4) other groups considered racially or ethnically inferior were targets.  

The decisions that Nazi leaders made at the Wannsee Conference of 1942 were that the genocide of Europe’s Jews would be carried out, the term “Final Solution” was used to refer to the genocide, and other groups considered racially or ethnically inferior were targets.

The top Nazi officials met in Wannsee, Berlin, on January 20, 1942. During these meeting, the Nazi officials considered the possibility of sending the European Jews to the Island of Madagascar in Africa, but they dropped the idea because was not practical in times of international conflict. Finally, the sad decisions were that the genocide of Europe’s Jews would be carried out, the term “Final Solution” was used to refer to the genocide, and other groups considered racially or ethnically inferior were targets.

answer by yourhope:

the speaker of which statement would be best served by joining an interest group?

i want politicians to make more of an effort for lgbt rights!

: )

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.