why did proponents of the torture memo believe that waterboarding was an acceptable interrogation technique?

they argued that waterboarding was used in multiple conflicts throughout the twentieth century.

they argued that waterboarding was not considered torture in countries like iraq, so could be used by the united states.

they argued that the president had the authority to do whatever he deemed necessary to get information in the global war on terrorism.

they argued that congress had not specifically outlawed waterboarding, so it should be upheld as a useful tactic.

The answer would be: they argued that the president had the authority to do whatever he deemed necessary to get information in the global war on terrorism. There are many proponents of the “Enhanced Interrogation” methods, which they believed to allow them to gain information.

possible the invasion of room could have been avodiable but the people of rome were to stubboron and to wealthy the kingdoms saw them as a threat if they dialred it downa   bit ten i dont think they wouldnt failed   china was not iacvvdoaible they caused war to much and were out of hand therefor that must have happened india i dont really know it could of