(easy question i don't remember the answer to)

would it be possible to have a socialist direct democracy?

a) no, in a socialist society only a few high-ranking members of the communist party have political power.

b) no, a direct democracy requires a free market economy which is not socialist.

c) yes, if everyone voted on economic decisions rather than letting markets decide them, then it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

d) yes, if the society was ruled by a king who made the majority of economic decisions, it could be considered a socialist direct democracy.

answer is a meeting of congress.

explanation:

hope my answer has you!

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: