subject
History, 05.10.2019 07:00 juansantos3328

Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?

a: in miranda v. arizona the supreme court ruled that it is the attorney's duty to inform suspects of their rights.

b: in miranda v. arizona, the supreme court decided that it is the citizens' responsibility to be aware of their own rights.

c: in gideon v. wainwright, the supreme court decided that every person who was convicted at trial and did not have an attorney deserves a new trial.

d: in gideon v. wainwright, the supreme court ruled that every state must provide an attorney when the defendant cannot afford one.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:30
What is the definition of double v campaign
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which of the following quotes from the constitution describes the senate? "no person…who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five years, and been seven years a citizen of the united states, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state in which he shall be chosen." "the…shall chose their other officers, and also a president pro tempore, in the absence of the vice president, or when he shall exercise the office of president of the united states.""the…shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states.""the…shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment."
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Me! will mark brainiest! essential questions: • for what reasons will one group of people exploit another? focus questions: • what influenced the development of the south more: geography, economy or slavery? • what were the economic, political and social arguments for and against slavery in the first half of the 19th century?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Which statement describes the primary purpose of the european union? question 1 options: to protect european nations in the event of another world war to work together to strengthen europe and benefit all member nations to prevent alliances from forming between member nations to share resources and make economic trade easier between coal and steel companies
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following best explains the outcome and significance of the case described?
Questions
question
English, 24.06.2019 10:30