What best describes the difference in style between the declaration of independence and the bill of rights? select all that apply.
the declaration was written without the of a committee of style.
the declaration was intended for a wide audience and is written in a more powerful, persuasive style.
the bill of rights was intended as a legal document while the declaration carried no legal significance.
the bill of rights was intended for delegates and lawmakers and is written in a more precise, technical style.

The correct answer is The Bill of Rights was intended as a legal document while the Declaration carried no legal significance.

The Declaration of Independence did not carry any legal significance because it was a mere statement of facts and ideas about America. In this case, nobody could stop America from becoming a country and they needed no approval.

As far as the Bill of Rights, this is a legal document because it was passed by the members of Constitutional Convention who worked together to develop this set of rights. These rights would ensure protection against government tyranny.

i receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. it is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations — that for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.

this is a way. : )

confedracy

supported slavery

upheld the supremacy of federal laws

believed states should be able to nullify federal laws

union

wanted to abolish slavery

supported high tariffs

upheld the supremacy of federal laws