In the case marbury v. madison, what was william marbury’s appointment?

a)he was appointed as a federal judge.
b)he was appointed secretary of state.
c)he was appointed as a state judge.
d)he was appointed to serve on the supreme court.

In the case Marbury v. Madison, William Marbury’s appointment was as a federal judge. Thus, the answer is (A) “resulted in the establishment of the principle of judicial review.”

EXPLANATION  

In 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court Case Marbury v. Madison resulted in the establishment of the judicial review’s principle - the power of federal courts declaring executive and legislative actions unconstitutional. The opinion was written by Chief Judge John Marshall.

Two years earlier, on 2 March 1801, President John Adams mentioned that William Marbury was one of forty-two peace judges. The following day the Senate approved his candidacy. However, Secretary of State John Marshall failed to deliver four commissions including Marbury. Later, when Thomas Jefferson took office, he ordered the detention of the remaining four commissions.

Marbury then sued James Madison as the new secretary of state to get his commission (from his position as a peace judge for the Washington Area in the District of Columbia). On February 24, 1803, did the Supreme Court issued its opinion. the court ruled that the court did not have jurisdiction in this case and could not force Jefferson and Madison to occupy Marbury.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

Who is responsible for scheduling the bills for the floor debate in the Senate?  

•The Constitution gives Congress the power to create federal courts

KEYWORD: supreme, court, federal

Subject: History

Class: 7 – 9

Subchapter: Marbury v. Madison

The correct option is (A) He was appointed as a federal judge.

Further Explanation:

The Judicial division of the United States is established both at the federal and state level. The Court exercises the right to solve the conflict between national or state importance. The Supreme Court in America is the “highest Federal Judiciary” having original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction over all indigenous and state courts. It can be concluded that cases that are related to ‘Freedom of Speech’, according to the First Amendment, the federal court has the right to say for the protection.

The “Marbury versus Madison” case is famous for its unbelievable ruling in America’s history. The ruling upturned the congress’ Act for the single reason behind it being unconstitutional. In the legislative branch, t

he enacted laws that don’t disobey the constitution as it is the utmost law of the country. In any case, the “Judicial branch’ has the right to overturn it as it has ‘Judicial Review authority’.

Learn More:

Answer Details:

Grade: Middle School

Chapter: Marbury v. Madison

Subject: History

Keywords: federal and state level, court, supreme court, jurisdiction, appellate jurisdiction, freedom of speech, congress, constitution, Judicial Review Authority, the judicial branch

crop rotation kepy different plants in the soil instead of once constintly. when switching out plants you have different nutrients being absorbed at different speeds and different roots growing differently therfore the spoil and water flow have to adapt and carry fresh nutrients to carry the constant changes that were going on in the soil.

a.impressment of us soldiers