Which statement accurately describes a key difference between simón bolívar and josé de san martín?
a. san martín believed in nonviolent resistance to colonial rule, while bolívar preferred a violent revolution.
b. bolívar fought to preserve spanish rule over peru, while san martín fought against the spanish.
c. bolívar declared himself emperor of venezuela, while san martín tried to make venezuela a democracy.
d. san martín led early revolts against spanish rule in peru, while bolívar liberated the entire country.

Correct answer choice is:

D. San Martín led early revolts against Spanish rule in Peru, while Bolívar liberated the entire country.

Explanation:

San Martin and Bolivar are the principal names of the liberators of Spanish America. These men had plans, however, completely different for the longer term of the countries. San Martin fought for the formation of own monarchies, ruled by European princes invited by the countries. the concept was to facilitate diplomatic recognition. Bolivar, on the opposite hand, had as its objective to make a huge federation republic in all of America, because it was realized within the USA.

i do not know if this question has options, but a main impact of the federal reserve act of 1913, which created the federal reserve bank, was the international use of the u.s. dollar, which soon became the world's leading currency - particularly during world war i, since many nations around the world asked the united states for money.

states

explanation:

as the old saying goes, all politics are local. state and federal governments affect our daily lives in numerous ways. yet, in our federal system, there is supposed to be a balance between federal and state power. as james madison envisioned it in federalist no. 51, “the power surrendered by the people” would be “divided between two distinct governments,” creating a balance of power that would enable the “different governments [to] control each other.”