What was the ultimate outcome of the supreme court order for richard nixon to turn the information over to congress

The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Nixon of 1974 is a landmark decision on the limits of the powers of the President of the United States in relation to the other powers and to the domestic information system.

As part of the Watergate affair, President Nixon was asked by the Special Investigator and later by Congress to publish tapes recorded in the White House, which could have contributed to the investigation of the affair. Nixon, however, refused to release the tapes and instead offered copies of some of the recordings. The Judge of the District Court for Washington DC insisted on the release of the tapes, and the dispute eventually came before the Supreme Court of the United States.

Ultimately, the Court had to decide whether the legislature or the judiciary had the right to demand that the President of the United States, and thus the executive, publish it, or whether, as Nixon argued, this would violate the principle of separation of powers.

In its unanimous decision, the Court first made it clear that it had the competence to determine to what extent the United States Constitution restricts the powers of the President, and that the Constitution provides that laws may be enforced against the President. With regard to the executive power of the President, it stated that, in any case, it would not be given priority when it comes to the publication of evidence that is demonstrably relevant in criminal proceedings. So the tapes had to be released.

what is this news

explanation:

- "the past is made of multitudinous items ranging from anything that can be collected, recollected or assessed to originate in the past. as such, the past is a gallimaufry of particulars that may not have been related in any way. however, the human mind seeks organization to understand concepts and other things. the human mind therefore seeks relationships in explaining and studying the past. history being a humanity, dictates that historians have to serve this human trait by bringing structure to details of the past. historians do this by creating interpretive frameworks that capture as many details as possible."

< 3