When studying history, it is important to understand bias and its possible impact on a historical narrative. historians are a product of their various opinions and backgrounds, and the student of history must keep this in mind when studying a secondary historical source. one historian, for example, might place emphasis on the social causes of a historical event while another historian might argue for economic causes. these two points of view would have the potential to greatly impact the historical narrative told by these historians. which of the following is the main point of the passage used here? a. there can only be a few causes of any particular historical event. b. social causes of events are usually overshadowed by economic causes. c. a historian's narrative will reflect his or her own opinions. d. bias should be excluded from historical analysis as much as possible.

C. A historian's narrative will reflect his or her own opinions.

id say bottom left to top top left to bottom right and middle to middle

explanation:

hello there!

the graphics that you have attached within the question, indicates that few people in bolivia work in industry according to its labor force.

however, the graphic that is on the right side of the picture shows the gdp sector in bolivia. this gross domestic product is a macroeconomic magnitude   that shows the monetary value of all finished goods and services within a country's borders in a specific time period. in this case, the graphic is showing the monetary value in each sector -agriculture, industry and services- of bolivia in 2012.

so, although the first graphic located at the left side indicates that not so many people work in industry, this is the second most important sector according to the gdp metrics because of the monetary value that impacts on its country. it does not need to be the most valuable one. if it makes an impact on the country's economy, it will be definitely crucial to it.