Why did the United States support rulers in Iran and Chile during the Cold War who did not grant the people in their countries many basic human rights? 1. The United States owed money to these nations and was not in a position to influence the behavior of their rulers.
2. The United States was not aware of the human rights abuses committed by the rulers of these nations.
3. The United States prioritized combatting the spread of communism over fighting for the human rights of all people.
4. The United States then followed a strict policy of noninterference with regard to the domestic affairs of other nations.

north atlantic treaty organization.

on november 6 and 7, 1917 (or october 24 and 25 on the julian calendar, which is why the event is often referred to as the october revolution), leftist revolutionaries led by bolshevik party leader vladimir lenin launched a nearly bloodless coup d'état against the duma's provisional government.

treating native americans justly and giving them equal rights as citizens of the united states" was not a way in which americans sought to solve the indian problem. removal was the most popular idea.

when we think of a­ncient paga­n kings, the ideas of justice and fairness probably aren't the first things to come to mind. we moderns may be more likely to imagine fickle, power-hungry despots who were ready to put someone to death on a whim. but king hammurabi, who ruled a prosperous and thriving babyloniaalmost four millennia ago, doesn't quite fit that mold. he claimed to have protect the weak from oppression, and scholars believe he fostered an atmosphere of justice and righteousness for his people.

this belief is based on an object that was discovered only a century ago. it has already earned a place alongside the rosetta stone as one of the most important artifacts of the ancient world. this stela (stone pillar) bears the inscription of the code of hammurabi, and it has shed light on the laws, culture and life in babylonia.

read more on -