. Argentine leaders in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century often stressed similarities between their country and the United States. What was the basis of this comparison, and where did it go wrong? 2. What factors contributed to the formation and character of the working class in Argentina? How did it compare with working classes in, say, Peru and Mexico?
3. What were the central features of the Peronist coalition?
4. Why has the memory of Evita Perón retained symbolic significance in Argentina? Was she a pioneer for Latin American women?
5. What were the defining characteristics of the “bureaucratic-authoritarian” regimes that dominated Argentina from the mid-1960s to the early 1980s?
6. What accounts for Argentina’s transition to democracy in the 1980s?
7. In what ways has Peronism changed in recent years? In what ways has it stayed the same?

the answer is a. 250 percent.

d) all choices are correct

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.