How did many extremists in Iran respond when the USA allowed the Shah of Iran to enter America to seek cancer treatment?

Terence Smith, a correspondent in the Washington bureau of The Times, was the paper's chief White House correspondent during the Iranian crisis. By Terence Smith hen the evening packet of documents from the White House arrived at Camp David that Indian summer weekend, it included a memorandum from Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance that required an immediate Presidential decision. Jimmy Carter could not know it at the time, but that decision would set in train an extraordinary series of events that would preoccupy the nation for the next 15 months and profoundly affect his own future.

The issue posed by the memo on Oct. 21, 1979, had been nagging the Administration for months: Should Mohammed Riza Pahlevi, the exiled Shah of Iran, be allowed to enter the United States? Despite the risks such a move would entail, especially for the skeleton crew of Americans manning the embassy in revolutionary Teheran, most of Carter's advisers were for it. The President himself had been adamantly opposed and had lost his temper more than once on the subject. But now a new and urgent development had changed the situation and Vance was on the telephone from Washington asking for a

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation:

answer; i believe the two groups were irish immigrants and chinese immigrants;