A court decides to interpret a law in a way that encourages the limitation of a judge’s power. The court relies on similar past rulings and stays very close to the literal meaning of the Constitution in its approach. This court is engaging in judicial

Ifound this on google “the act represented the first effort since the passage of the civil rights act of 1964 to modify some of the basic procedural and substantive rights provided by federal law in employment discrimination cases. president bush had used his veto against the more comprehensive civil rights act of 1990.” for more information go to the website below › wiki › can you mark me brainliest?

Akajhnanananjjijii