5. One of the jurors originally felt that the boy was guilty because of the neighborhood that he ha grown up in. Was this a valid argument 12 angry men

No.

Explanation:

Unless the juror could refer to evidence which proved the boy had committed the crime, then that view is invalid. Such labelling, present in the film, showed the dangers in pre-judging an individual. The film was taking a liberal view of society and justice personified by Henry Fonda against the widespread conservative prejudices of his fellow jurors.

your answer would be (a)

there were abundant sources of fuel nearby