Now give your opinion on the constitutionality of the internment of Japanese Americans. Did the Supreme Court make the right decision in Korematsu v.
United States? Support your argument with evidence from at least one of the
amendments listed in the Bill of Rights.

In the Korematsu v. United States decision, the Supreme Court did not uphold the inconstiutionality of the Japanese Internment Camps upon Executive Order 9066.

Locking people up of Japanese decent for "military necessity" as it was deemed a crime against humanity later on by U.S. officials and was racist.

This broke the 6th amendment for which the Japanese people were locked up in cramped cabins which were surrounded by armed officers and barbed wires 24/7, being locked up for being guilty until proven innocent.

From which also broke the fourteenth amendment which garenteed the due process of law which japanese people were locked up if they didnt comply with orders or if they did, were sent in camps.

overview. prohibition was a nationwide ban on the sale and import of alcoholic beverages that lasted from 1920 to 1933. prohibition led directly to the rise of organized crime. the twenty-first amendment, ratified in december 1933, repealed prohibition.

i know social security wasn't one.

explanation:

hope my answer has you!