NO LINKSExplain the political cartoon above, including but not limited to the Supreme Court case that is represented, the reaction of schools and the general public, and the long lasting impacts of the courts actions.

It explains that on the outside segrigation was good but it was not

Explanation:

The crying kids mean the people who want it but the suprem court wants segigation banned.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3

explanation:

the answer is the huegonots.