In the 1983 case of hazelwood v. kulhmeier, did the supreme court agree or disagree with the principal and why?

the supreme court agreed with the principal stating educational administrators had the right to censor material that was deemed contrary to the school's educational mission.

the supreme court disagreed with the principal stating that newspaper editors could print students' stories and opinions without censorship as long as the material was not profane.

the supreme court disagreed with the principal citing tinker v. des moines and stated the principal had violated the students' first amendment rights of freedom of speech.

the supreme court agreed with the principal but said the article could be published in the school newspaper as long as the father's response was also included in the article.

A

Explanation:

because i read an article that said on the schools property they can do anything but not disturb the education so its

sorry i cant

2 another reason colonist hello

3 reasons colonist gave for not supporting the revolution are

1 they were scared of the british

some colonist were scard of british because they know what the other colinest were doing was treason and could result in execution so they decided not to participate in it

2 some colonist were loyal to britian   which were called the loyalist

many families were serpeated   because of this son and father 1 wetn to fight in the war the other fought aganiust them which created alot of dispute between the family and   they were revolted that there families were fighting aganist them

3   aswell some colinist also   were promised freedom and protected for them to fight on the side of the british so they fought for the british in return for there freedom and protection

hope i !