• Imagine you are a colonial soldier. How do you think your opinion of Europeans would change or not change during the war?

No. I will still see them as fighting for what they swear allegiance to and it is their duty to fight for their benefits or crown.

Explanation:

If I were to be a colonial soldier, I would still have the same opinion of Europeans during the war as fighting for what they swear allegiance to and they must fight for their benefits or crown.

Because it is a war, hence, both parties must fight for it. Though war is not always the answer, whenever a war breaks out, both parties must fight to win the war and eventually win the point of dispute.

Therefore the European soldiers are fighting for their leader who.in turn.must pay them.with good salaries and social infrastructure.

abraham lincoln, according to anyone who was connected with agriculture, represented the worst of northern politicians. shortly after lincoln was elected, south carolina seceded from the union. they along with other southern states, retained their anger. in a way, it was their own fault: the democrats were split in the south. some wanted slavery to be extended in other states that were about to join the union and some didn't want it badly enough. lincoln had a solid backing from his party: the republicans were united in not wanting slavery to be expanded.

2686-2181 bce-- "egyptian civilization developed along the nile river in large part because the river’s annual flooding ensured reliable, rich soil for growing crops."

1069-664 bce-- "ancient egyptians developed wide-reaching trade networks along the nile, in the red sea, and in the near east."