Hey pleasee help, will give brainliest! 1.Why are Supreme Court justices appointed for life?
2.What might be some benefits of requiring justices to serve a defined and limited term?
3.What might be some benefits of requiring justices to retire at a certain age?
4.Referring to the average length of time modern justices sit on the Supreme Court, one law professor stated that "Serving 25 years or more is too long in a democracy." What do you think he meant by that?
5.Do you support the current life appointment system or do you think justices should be forced to retire? Explain your answer

It would allow a current administration more power and not have an antagonizing Justice sitting in opposition to the president. Also, this way there would be a constant flow, and no one would get too comfy in their position.

Explanation:

affirmative action refers to the policies that take gender, race, or ethnicity into account in order to promote equal opportunity.

employers subject to title vii are prohibited from taking race or sex into account in any employment decisions. aa is a penalty for having any job group substantially statistically "underutilized" in any race or either sex. the employer must take steps to eliminate the underutilization, then stop, ending its aa efforts

the answer here would be