Do you think Polybius is a credible source about how democratic the Roman Republic was? Explain your reasoning.
(I will mark as brainliest, please help!!! <333)

His sources were mostly written; for his books ranging from 264 to 220, were essential. In the most important parts he recorded, from the year 220 onwards, he always consulted Greek and Roman writers. He was probably the most reliable historian who spoke about the history of Rome.S

Explanation:

Polybius is a credible source about how democratic the Roman Republic was because his reliability as a historian, which lead to him seeking information about the Greek and Roman writers, he wrote all of his genesis, facts down written on his books that took time 264-220 and so on :3

Explanation:

:3

"a shortage of traditional labor created new opportunities in the workplace. a major cause of the internment of japanese americans during world war ii was. racial prejudice. in the early 1940's, the "destroyers-for-military-bases deal" with great britain and the lend-lease act were evidence that the united states."