What arguments were made for and against the League of Nations? How did they compare with arguments for and against U. S. involvement in World War I?

For:

The League's goals included upholding the new found Rights of Man such as right of non whites, rights of women, rights of soldiers, disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, diplomacy and improving global quality of life. The diplomatic philosophy behind the League represented a fundamental shift in thought from the preceding hundred years.

Against:

The League lacked its own armed force and so depended on the Great Powers to enforce its resolutions, keep to economic sanctions which the League ordered, or provide an army, when needed, for the League to use. However, they were often reluctant to do so. Sanctions could also hurt the League members, so they were reluctant to comply with them.

Explanation:

Please Mark Brainliest

the hereditary right of a monarch to rule from the mandate of heaven

straight down to hell mate