Bar chart titled: Population Growth in New York City, 1800-1890. The chart shows a bar for 1800 which is pink totalling 79,215. A bar for 1810 which is light blue totalling 119,743. A bar for 1820 which is dark blue totalling 152,056. A bar for 1830 which is violet totalling 242,278. A bar for 1840 which is blue-green totalling 391,144. A bar for 1850 which is light green totalling 696,115. A bar for 1860 which is yellow totalling 1,174,779. A bar for 1870 which is light orange totalling 1,478,103. A bar for 1880 which is orange totalling 1,911,698. A bar for 1890 which is red totalling 2,507,414. Use the chart titled "Population Growth in New York City, 1800-1890" to answer the following question:

Between 1800 and 1890, the population of New York City (5 points)

a
decreased by more than three-quarters

b
increased more than two million

c
decreased by less than two million

d
fell by more than half

answer: karl marx, max weber, and emile durkheim (the fourth could be considered georg simmel)

explanation:

the correct answer is d

a conference committee is a group of congress representatives appointed by the senate and the house to reach an agreement over a bill that had different versions in each chamber. this is due to the fact that, to pass a law. both the house and the senate must agree on the exact same content and wording of the bill to present it to the president.

that was the type of government the spanish colonists were used to.

informed opinion on immigration policy and immigration reforms from the american pubic is not complicated but a nuance. most americans support secure borders and they are not happy that the national’s immigration system is broken. people think that immigrants that shoulder similar responsibilities like native americans should be able to become americans. in the recent polls, stats have shown that there is a good support for tenets of comprehensive immigration reform. for example, in recent polls concerning opinions on immigration reforms, voters want congress to act even if status quo has no support. immigration opponents suggest that latino and non-latino voters disagree and there is controversy in the issue of citizenship.the truth is that the issue is about its leadership and problem-solving aspect and not about immigration reform.the opponents of immigration reforms advocate for the promotion of two myths where the first one is that republican politicians have a choose on latino votes and the second one is that the path to citizenship for unrecorded immigrant is controversial among all this !