subject
History, 26.02.2021 01:00 krisayon8126

In the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, a wide variety of resistance movements across Asia and Africa fought against European imperialism. These movements reflected a range of organizational principles, from traditional kingdoms to religious movements to guerrilla nationalists. Develop an argument that compares at least two resistance movements in terms of their values, organization, and effectiveness at achieving their goals.

In your response, you should do the following:

Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt
Use specific, relevant evidence to support an argument in response to the prompt
Use historical reasoning (e. g., comparison) to frame or structure an argument that addresses the prompt
Use evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify an argument that addresses the prompt

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
How and why did many southerners attempt to stop the laws congress passed?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Nhis essay about the atomic bombing of japan during world war ii, a student has used statistics he found in an article in the online archives of the irish times. the article is from may 5, 1997, and is called “cancer finding in hiroshima.” there is no author given. how should the student cite this source using mla citation format?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Hin t in the section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? he section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? ow does the writer's point of view in "the completely free market" affect the credibility of the article? a. it's written in the third person, which allows the author to examine all sides of the debate. b. since it's written in the first person, it doesn't objectively present all sides of the argument. c. since it's written in the second person, it puts the reader in the writer's position, and gives the reader more to consider from this perspective. d. it's written in the first person, but is conducted as an interview with several different sources, providing a full-circle debate.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What does the term “escalation” refer to?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, a wide variety of resistance movements across Asia and...
Questions
question
Health, 27.05.2021 17:30
question
Mathematics, 27.05.2021 17:30
question
English, 27.05.2021 17:30
question
Social Studies, 27.05.2021 17:30