subject
History, 25.02.2021 23:10 LindseyN1

Please help me??? The conventional explanation is that Herbert Hoover, President when Wall Street collapsed and during the period when the crisis turned into the Great Depression, was a laissez-faire ideologue who refused to use public money and government power to refloat the economy. As soon as FOR succeeded him, in 1933, and having no such inhibitions about government intervention started to apply state planning, the clouds lifted and the nations got back to work. There is no truth in this mythology, though there were indeed profound differences of the character between the two men. Neither understood the nature of the Depression, or how to cure it. It is likely that the efforts of both merely served to prolong the crisis.
-Paul Johnson A History of the American People

When the New Deal was over, capitalism remained intact. The rich still controlled the nation's wealth, as well as its laws, courts, police, newspapers, churches, and colleges. Enough help had been given to enough people to make Roosevelt a hero to millions, but the same system that had brought depression and crisis-the system of waste, of inequality of concern for profit over human need-remained.
-Howard Zinn A Peoples History of the United States

FDR knew nothing about how wealth was created. the legislation he called for was a patchwork of absurdities, sometimes at odds with each other, and sometimes even at odds with themselves. What finally brought the Depression to an end was noether economic legislation nor WWII. Instead, it was the return to normal conditions following the war and the removal of the uncertainty that had haunted business during the FDR years. Prosperity would have returned much sooner had it not been for the destructive and foolish policies of Hoover and Roosevelt.
-Thomas Woods The Politically Incorrect Guide to American Hostory

1. Johnson is a conservative historian, Zinn is a very liberal historian, and Woods is a libertarian history; what about the depression and the new deal do these three very different historians agree?
2. How do these three quotes go against the conventional wisdom of what ended the Great Depression?
3. According to Woods, what ended the Great Depression?
4. According to Zinn, what didnt the Mew Deal change?​

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:30
Business owners take great risks when they invest in equipment and workers to produce goods. they are committed to finding the best ways to run their business and should have control over production and profits. in the end workers and the public will benefit. who would be the most likely to agree with that statement? a. robert owen b. keri hardie c. karl marx d. adam smith
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
How did access to and rivers the progress of industriation in britain
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:30
Which statement best summarizes the colonial system belgium created in the congo free state? o a. belgians relied on threats and brutal violence to force natives to work on rubber plantations, o b. belgians encouraged mass immigration from europe to force natives from their lands. o c. belgians improve local economies but stripped natives of their political rights. d. belgians offered natives political equality only if they gave up their traditional beliefs
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:20
The bubonic plague killed 35% to 50% of the european population. the death toll was much higher in urban areas then in rural ones. the disproportion of mortality rates can be attributed to fact that cities were more densely populated then rural areas. england and italy were mostly affected; in some towns, the plague claimed 70-80% of the residents. the high death rates resulted in a large amount of wealth and property being passed from one owner to another as people moved from the country to the and other members of the clergy contracted the plague at a higher rate, because they had more contact with people infected by the disease. because of the high mortality rate, the church was desperately in need of new priests. many young priests were ordained without proper training. these inexperienced clergymen caused many to lose respect for the church. according to the passage, what were the effects of the plague? select all that apply. about 70 percent of europeans died. the plague resulted in people moving to the cities. the plague caused people to lose faith in the church. more people enrolled in universities and became priests. wealth and property changed hands after people died.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Please help me??? The conventional explanation is that Herbert Hoover, President when Wall Street c...
Questions
question
Biology, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Biology, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
English, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
English, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 14.09.2020 14:01
question
English, 14.09.2020 14:01