BRAINIEST You've seen many examples of imperialism in action in this module. Does colonization always lead to exploitation or oppression? Is it possible for a more powerful country to occupy a weaker one without causing great harm to the people or the culture there?

If you think that colonization could be a good thing, explain what that would look like. What would a nation have to do differently to prevent the misdeeds of the European imperialists?

If you think that colonization cannot possibly go well, at least for the country that is colonized, explain why it is a practice that is doomed to fail.

(choose one to answer.. give me 4 sentences)

For colonization to be a good thing

Explanation:

There are a few things that would have to happen for colonization to be a good thing. For one, there would have to be resources or something else that the mother country wanted in the new colony. There would have to be people to settle the colony and harvest the resource. There would have to be soliders there to help keep peace. The people would have to have a say in the things that would take place in the colony. They would generally have to feel like the mother country cared about them.

I believe that it is impossible to avoid oppression or harm to native peoples.

Explanation:

During the time when Europeans were taking over territories in Asia and Africa, they believed that they were somehow better than others, and that it was their destiny or right to take over what they believed to be uncivilized nations and change their entire cultural identity to accommodate the Western idea of civilized peoples. Of course, in some cases this process was not violent, but either way Europeans caused harm to cultural identities, forced people into working to create raw materials so Europeans could manufacture products, and caused countries to suffer economically for European benefit. In short, there is no way that Europeans could take over without causing harm to people within the new colonies.

britain's king george iii, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written we consider whom we must oppose in this contest, and if it continues, what may the fundamental grounds upon which americans were taking up arms had shifted. that king george refused to so much as receive the