How would have John C. Calhoun MOST LIKELY responded If the federal government enacted a law banning slavery in the entire United States in the 1830s?
A)
He would have argued that Southern states would have to follow the law
unless they seceded from the United States.
B)
He would have argued that the law would only apply in states whose
congressional representatives supported the law.
He would have argued that the law was unconstitutional because the
Constitution specifically denied Congress the right to restrict slavery.
D)
He would have argued that Southern states had the right to nullify the law
and residents could practice slavery unless state laws outlawed it.

i confess that there are several parts of this constitution which i do not at present approve, but i am not sure i shall never approve them: for having lived long, i have experienced many instances of being obliged by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions even on important subjects, which i once thought right, but found to be otherwise. it is therefore that the older i grow, the more apt i am to doubt my own judgment, and to pay more respect to the judgment of others.

c. businesses/firms & government

the spanish  

hope this meaning spain btw

nationalization is the set of dispositions and operations by means of which the state assumes, in varied form, the administration of private companies, of groups of companies or of the totality of certain economic sectors previously managed by individuals, such as the land portions. nationalization is the opposite of privatization. it is also called nationalization of the means of production, although a nationalized company can be previously both national and foreign ownership. nationalization or nationalization is a very characteristic action of ideologies such as socialism and nationalism.