In your readings this week you have read about positive and negative impacts of exploration. Exploration forever changed the world. Exploration caused ideas to spread, new plants to be discovered (helped prevent famine; found
cures for disease), trade to increase, economies and wealth to grow, new technologies to be developed, etc. However,
exploration also led to the spread of diseases to native
populations, unfair working conditions, eradication of hundreds
of languages, loss of land from native peoples, slavery, imperialism, etc.
All decisions come with a cost. Was exploration justified? Was it worth it? Did the end (the positives of exploration)
justify the means (the negatives of exploration)?

Hurry, dont joke around, I will give out brainliest, please help

everything we can buy.like love affection, care,etc.we must be positive. reduce slavery as well asother negative impact

This really depends on the point of view and the opinions of an invidiual. I prefer to look at todays world and try to imagine, how would todays world look if exploration and colonization after never happened. Many goods and other stuff would not exist, Population density would be a lot higher, people would poorer, many people who changed the history of world would maybe never be borned or they would not ever have the chance to change the world. On the other hand, many languages would still be spoken and many people would have easier lifes.

Explanation:

As i said. This is really personal question, but i would Yes. Yes, the exploration is justified and worth it. Pluses are bigger then minuses.

- three-quarters or two-thirds..

- "the constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the house of representatives and the senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures."

< 3

you work at weenie hut juniors if you answer this question