Help please What was the opinion of the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia regarding Indian Removal? *
A. That state governments could remove the Native Americans
B. That native land was sovereign and that federal and state governments could not take it over
C. That Andrew Jackson and the authority to use the military against the Natives
D. That native land was owned by the United States

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho

consider an orange peel: if you want to try and lay it flat, you have to stretch it, we know exactly how things are being stretched or squashed at any given point. we have many different map projections because each has different patterns of some projections can even preserve certain features of the earth without

state law

most seat belt laws in the united states are left to the states. however, the first seat belt law was a federal law.