Do you think that conflict can be justified when a compromise cannot be reached? Why or why not?​

below

Explanation:

While it may produce an agreement, compromise does not always resolve problems that contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict. This is because compromise is frequently a "settled" resolution to a problem and not typically the optimal solution sought by either party.

Pikuai answers~

When a compromise cannot be made neither party is in the right nor wrong because it cannot be proven nor decided upon. Now, there's a chance a compromise can be made simply by picking another party of people to give their opinion's on the situation. But, I'm saying this from the perspective they cannot do that.

~I hope this helps! I can give more to support why I say no but this Is the bare min. Have a great day!

answer: "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is a well-known phrase in the united states declaration of independence. the phrase gives three examples of the "unalienable rights" which the declaration says have been given to all humans by their creator, and which governments are created to protect.

hope this < 3