Why did Parliament believe the colonists would accept the Tea Act of 1773? A.
Revenues raised by this act would go toward paying royal governors’ salaries.
B.
This act repealed the offensive Townshend Duties that taxed all imports.
C.
The revenues raised by this act would go toward the defense of the colonies.
D.
The colonial assemblies would collect the revenues raised by this act.
E.
This act substantially lowered the price of tea sold in the colonies.

This act substantially lowered the price of tea sold in the colonies.

also love you bella. Youve been there when i needed you and for that i thank you. Your a kind soul (when u want to be) lol but i still appreciate all you do for meh.

hey there! these are the answers.

to generate donations

to organize supporters

to solicit support

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is