1.Explain ONE major difference between Kipling's and Labouchère's interpretations of European colonialism. 2.Provide ONE piece of evidence from the period of Imperialism during the 1800s that supports Kipling's (SOURCE 1) interpretation and explain HOW it supports that interpretation.

3.Provide ONE piece of evidence from the period of Imperialism during the 1800s that supports Labouchère's (SOURCE 2) interpretation and explain HOW it supports that interpretation.

someone pls help me I am going to fail if I don't do this and I don't get it they are the last ones and they are worth 25 points each

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.  

i believe it is capitalists.  

"they had a large area of land that they owned."

the answer is b. hope this