how does interpretation b differ from interpretation a about Martin Luther king and the civil rights?

Interpretaion B seems more cynical of all that Martin Luther King actually did.

Explanation:

In Interpretation B, he states, "Without King, the civil rights campaign would still have happened." This seems to be implying that, unlike Interpretation A, he does not agree that MLK was as much of a fuss as we make him otu to be. Where-as, Interpretation A highly praises MLK, stating, "Martin Luther was an inspiration to our nation."

Hope this helps!

lincoln presided over the union victory in the american civil war, which dominated his presidency. a former whig, lincoln ran on a political platform opposed to the expansion of slavery in the territories. his election served as the immediate impetus for the outbreak of the american civil war.

when a country suffers, for example, a drought period, the market product is affected for a low offer, in this case, potatoes; the government has to tax to the households, which have to give more money for the potatoes which they consume, that situation make them consume substitute goods even through loans, it could increase the financial market movement and the inflationary phenomena, the business has to increase salaries in order to the employees could buy a more expensive food (potatoes) and in order to inflation tha business had to buy expensive supplies in the factor market, while the rest of the world have to gain more money to consume the same amount of potatoes.