One argument that the dissenting justices make is that you cannot conclude an entire group will be disloyal just because what?

One argument that dissenting judges make is that you can not conclude that an entire group will be disloyal just because one member of the group was disloyal.

Explanation:

It is an unfair judgment to generalize an entire group of disloyal when it is proved that just as some of its members acted with disloyalty.

In politics, a dissent is the act of disagreeing with an official policy, with an instituted (or constituted) power or with a collective decision. Individuals and groups that opt for dissent are called dissidents. The term is particularly applied to dissidences that take place in authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

brainliest is someone you pick by simply clicking a button. it only shows up if there are two people that answered your question, then you decide who answer more accurately with detail and explanation and you give that person the title "brainliest".

i hope this your understandings.

this isn't a question and if you're going to list things be kind and use commas.