Tarea. me ayudas con esta pregunta es la que me falta para acabar mi tarea ¿la diferencias entre los liberales y los conservadores llevaron a una serie de cambios entre 1854 y 1876 ¿que postura predomino en estos años ?

La respuesta correcta es la siguiente.

Por los nombres que mencionas y las fechas, parece ser que estás preguntando por una etapa importante en la historia de México, cuando la lucha entre liberales y conservadores representó una serie de pugnas y confrontaciones que lastimaron al país, pero cuya consecuencia fue el avance a un periodo de reformas.

Rebeldes liberales Mexicanos como Melchor Ocampo y Benito Juárez, se levantaron contra el conservador Antonio Lóez de Santana en 1854 bajo el Plan de Ayutla, cuya victoria generó la Constitución de Ayutla de 1857. Los Liberales destronaban a los Conservadores y Benito Juárez se convertía en Presidente de la República Mexicana. Juárez se dio a la tarea de establecer una serie de modificaciones en el país llamadas "Leyes de Reforma" para separar la Iglesia del Estado, algo que resultó muy benéfico para el país.

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.

when people started to question traditional christian beliefs, they became criminals in the eyes of the church: they were accused of heresy and then, executed. the church held unbelievable power and anyone who tried to defy it or its beliefs, was demonized and persecuted.

mark brainliest and have a stunning day!