This graph shows social media usage and presidential elections. A bar chart shows the number of tweets in millions for 2008 was 10 and 32 in 2012. What can you infer from the information presented within this graph? social media has become an important tool in presidential campaigns presidential campaigns have become lesson important to older Americans social media has had little to no impact on how politicians campaign presidential campaigns spent more money on advertising

I apologize but there is no graph shown therefor I cannot come up with an answer. I can come up with an idea however.

Explanation:

From what I know I can infer that the difference between the numbers can show the growth or difference in between which ones were more known. I can also come with the conclusion that the tweets werent as well known in 2008 as they are in 2012.

I hope this helped with an answer or get an idea of how to answer it!

it's a secular holiday. it is and was a custom developed to recognize the ending of a time and a wish for a good future. the kind of kiss you exchange, if you are single, is intended to predict what kind of year you will have in the coming year.

it is saying good bye to the last year with all its ups and downs, and hello to the new year, with all its hopes and dreams.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is