Which fallacy of logical structure is committed by the following argument? Historians don’t know whether the lost continent of Atlantis was a real place, so it probably never existed. appeal to ignorance

Appeal to ignorance

Explanation:

A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning that tries to prove a point or give reason to a theory or thought that is wrong from the beginning because the logical fallacy does not provide justification, in this case the logical fallacy is the appeal to ignorance which basically is saying I'm right, because there's no proof against my process of thought, just because there's no proof that Atlantis existed I can not assure that it never existed.

the fact that could also be added to column b is that during world war ii, specifically between the years 1941 and 1945, japan expanded its territory towards the indonesian territory in what was known later as part of the "pacific war". in that time, japan could conquer the philipines, singapore,   borneo, central java, malang, cebu, sumatra and various other islands of the area, therefore expanding its territory for a brief period of time.

b: the exchange of coined money